crowding phenomenon
The crowding phenomenon is the loss of visual acuity that occurs when a letter is surrounded by other contours, as in a line of letters, compared with the same letter seen alone. Contour interaction between neighboring targets causes the loss, and the effect is also called separation difficulty.1,2
Many amblyopic eyes recognize much smaller symbols presented singly than symbols presented in a row, so these eyes effectively have two acuities, line acuity and single-optotype acuity. The difference can be large, and a line acuity of 6/30 may correspond to 6/6 with single symbols. About two thirds of amblyopic patients show crowding at the first examination. Crowding is not specific to amblyopia, because adjacent contours also reduce form recognition in normal eyes.1 The effect is exaggerated in strabismic amblyopia, although strabismic and anisometropic amblyopes probably form a continuum.2,3
Line acuity is the clinical standard, and an amblyopic eye cannot be considered cured until it reaches standard line acuity. Single-optotype tests lack crowding and overestimate acuity, which makes them unreliable for amblyopia screening.1 Real text is more crowded than a letter chart, and that may explain why a successfully treated amblyope can still have trouble reading passages of text.3
More detail
In one quantitative study of contour interaction, black bars were placed near a Landolt C. Below a critical separation between the bars and the C, the probability of seeing the C fell rapidly. The critical separation was 1.9 to 3.8 minutes of arc in normal eyes and 8.4 to 23.3 minutes of arc in amblyopic eyes. Expressed as multiples of each eye's minimum angle of resolution, the curves for normal and amblyopic eyes were essentially similar, so the extent of crowding follows the eye's resolving capacity.1
During treatment, single-optotype acuity improves faster than line acuity, and therapy often ends with normal single-symbol vision and substandard line vision. If standard line acuity is not reached, the vision of the amblyopic eye is likely to regress, so the presence or absence of crowding at the end of treatment has prognostic value. Letter spacing differs widely between charts, and an amblyopic eye can measure differently on two charts in the same office. The ideal chart scales the separation between letters and lines with the letter size.1
Sources (9)
- von Noorden and Campos, Binocular Vision and Ocular Motility, ch. 14
- Pickwell's Binocular Vision Anomalies, Glossary
- Pickwell's Binocular Vision Anomalies, ch. 13
- Noorden, G. K. V., & Campos, E. C. (2002). Binocular vision and ocular motility: Theory and management of strabismus. Mosby.
- Kushner, B. J. (2017). Strabismus. In W. Tasman & E. A. Jaeger (Eds.), Duane's Ophthalmology (2017 ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
- Levi, D. M. (2008). Crowding—An essential bottleneck for object recognition: A mini-review. Vision Research, 48(5), 635-654.
- PubMed: 7000176
- PubMed: 32232567
- PubMed: 19778988
Reviewed October 2026
Related terms
Nearby in the glossary
- covariation
- CPF lens
- cross fixation
- crowding phenomenon
- cycloplegia
- cyclovertical muscles