A network meta-analysis of 17 studies (12 retrospective, 5 randomized) in 1492 patients with stage II to IV idiopathic macular hole found that peeling with 0.25% of this dye performed worse for hole closure than peeling with no dye at all, while 0.05% brilliant blue G, 0.15% trypan blue, 0.5% and 0.05% of this dye all outperformed 0.25%; the authors suggest 0.05% as a good choice for surgeons who prefer this dye, and call for large high-quality randomized trials to confirm the ranking. A separate meta-analysis of 9 studies and 846 eyes found better postoperative acuity with brilliant blue G than with this dye (mean difference -0.10 logMAR, 95% CI -0.16 to -0.03, P=0.004, negative favoring brilliant blue G) but no significant difference in closure rate (OR 1.98, 95% CI 0.71 to 5.48, P=0.19).