Non-infectious intermediate or posterior uveitis
Oral, dosed to effect and to renal tolerance; the trial used doses high enough to raise creatinine and blood pressure
RCT · n=56 · only 46% each
A randomised double-masked trial compared cyclosporine with prednisolone in 56 patients with bilateral sight-threatening non-infectious intermediate or posterior uveitis. Visual acuity or vitreous haze improved in only 13 of 28 patients (46%) in each arm, and macular oedema resolved in 7 of 15 on cyclosporine against 10 of 16 on prednisolone (p=0.376). Twenty-eight patients per arm cannot exclude a real difference, so this is a failure to detect one rather than a demonstration that the two are equal, and the authors' own word is that only 46% improved: two mediocre options, not two good ones. Patients who failed both drugs alone improved on the combination. The notable adverse effects were rises in serum creatinine and hypertension. Formulation caveat, which comes from the dates rather than from the paper: this trial published in 1991 and the Neoral microemulsion reached the market in 1995, so it necessarily used the original oil-based formulation. The two are not interchangeable without blood-level monitoring, and Neoral gives higher exposure per milligram, so neither the response rate nor the creatinine and blood-pressure signal transfers dose for dose.
Non-infectious ocular inflammation, as a corticosteroid-sparing agent
151 to 250 mg daily in adults; the cohort found lower doses less successful and higher doses no better
Cohort · n=373 · 52% at 1 yr